Skip to main content

Rand Paul Blocks $40B Ukraine Bill, Explains Why

rand paul

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0, via Flickr

In remarks on the Senate floor Thursday, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) spoke about why he was blocking a $40 billion Ukraine bill. Do watch and read his complete speech below:


On the Senate floor, Rand Paul said:

Reserving the right to object. My oath of office is to the U.S. Constitution not to any foreign nation. And no matter how sympathetic the cause my oath of office is to the national security of the United States of America. 

We cannot save Ukraine by dooming the U.S. Economy. In march inflation hit a 40-year high, gasoline alone is up 48 percent and energy prices are up 32 percent from the last year. Food prices have increased by nearly nine percent, used vehicle prices are up 35 percent for the year and new vehicle prices have increased 12% or more. 

Yes inflation doesn't just come out of nowhere, it comes from deficit spending. The United States spent nearly five trillion dollars on COVID-19 bailouts leading to one of the highest and most sustained levels of inflation in U.S. history Americans are feeling the pain and Congress seems intent only on adding to that pain by shoveling more money out the door as fast as they can.

This Ukraine bill under consideration would spend 40 billion dollars. This is the second spending bill for Ukraine in two months, and this bill is three times larger than the first. Our military aid to Ukraine is nothing new, though since 2014 the United States has provided more than six billion dollars in security assistance to Ukraine. In addition to the 14 billion dollars, Congress authorized just a month ago, if this bill passes the U.S. will have authorized roughly 60 billion dollars in total spending for Ukraine. For those who say this is not enough, for those of you in this chamber who say that our military spending is never enough let's put 60 billion dollars into perspective.

According to Elias Youssef security assistance at the Stimson Center, Kyiv would become the largest yearly recipient of U.S. military aid of the past two decades. Except for the top five countries, 60 billion dollars is more than every other country in the world spends on their entire military expenditures. 

If this gift of Ukraine passes our total aid to Ukraine will almost equal the entire military budget of Russia and it's not as if we have that money lying around, we will have to borrow that money from China to send it to Ukraine. The cost of this package we were voting on today is more than the U.S. spent during the first year of the U.S. conflict in Afghanistan.

Congress authorized force and the President sent troops into the conflict the same cannot be said of Ukraine. This proposal towers over domestic priorities as well the massive package of 60 billion dollars to Ukraine dwarfs the 6 million spent on cancer research annually. 

60 billion is more than the amount the government collects in gas taxes each year to build roads and bridges. The 60 billion dollars to Ukraine could fund substantial portions or entire large cabinet departments, the 60 billion dollars nearly equals the entire state department budget, the 60 billion exceeds the budget for the Department of Homeland Security and for the Department of Energy, and Congress just wants to keep on spending and spending.

Our allies and partners have sent aid to Ukraine, some of them even broke long-standing traditions by sending military assistance. Germany, Poland the United Kingdom, and others are stepping up to defend Ukraine like never before. In other words, it's not all about us, it isn't that we always have to be the uncle Sam the policeman that saves the world particularly when it's on borrowed money. Yet the United States accounted for nearly half of what's been spent so far.

With a 30 trillion dollar debt, America can't afford to be the world's policeman. The U.S. is trying to recover from the 1.6 trillion we spent on wars in the middle east, not to mention the 5 trillion borrowed for COVID, we should not forget that the Soviet Union collapsed in large part not because it was defeated militarily, but because it ran out of money.

In an attempt to save Ukraine, we will doom or will we doom the United States to such a future. In the past two years, the U.S. has borrowed more money than in our history. We are already experiencing the greatest rate of inflation in over four decades. The assault on monetary discipline is untenable and it cannot go on forever unless we put an end to the fiscal insanity a day of reckoning awaits us. Congress should evaluate the cost of continuing down this path. The biggest threat to the United States of the day is debt and inflation and the dollar's destruction.

We cannot save Ukraine by killing our economic stress or economic strength, So I have to modify the bill to allow for a special inspector general. This would be the inspector general that's been overseeing the waste in Afghanistan and has done a great job. So, therefore I asked the senator to modify his request so that the senate proceeds to the immediate consideration of calendar 368-HR 7691. Furthermore that the Paul Amendment the desk be considered and agreed to the bill as amended be considered a third time, and the Senate vote on passage of the bill as amended with this with a 60 affirmative vote threshold for passage. 

After Sen. Paul's Speech, Chuck Schumer replied and said:
Reserving the right to object. It's clear from the junior Senator from Kentucky's remarks he doesn't want to aid Ukraine, but that is not the case for the overwhelming majority here. Again all he will accomplish with his actions here today is to delay that aid not to stop it it's desperately needed by a valiant people fighting against authoritarianism and defending democracy so I will not modify it, Schumer added in his remarks.



Popular posts from this blog

'This Is The Most Extraordinary Thing I Have Ever Seen': Hawley, Biden Nom Have Unbelievable Clash

  Photo credit: Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0,  via Flickr At today's Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) clashed with Colleen Shogan, nominee to be Archivist of the United States, and National Archives and Records Administration. On February 28, 2023, Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) clashed with Colleen Shogan, nominee to be Archivist of the United States and National Archives and Records Administration, at a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing. The heated exchange centered around Shogan's past public statements on social media and her refusal to provide a full accounting of her public posts. During the hearing, Hawley questioned Shogan about her previous statements on Twitter, which he characterized as "pretty grossly partisan and...offensive." He asked her to provide a full accounting of her public posts on Twitter, to which Shogan responded that her personal Twitter account consisted of posts about her mystery novels, events at the W

'Why Would We Subsidize Non-US Citizens?': Governor DeSantis Defends Ending Tuition Help For Undocumented

  Photo credit: Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0,  via Flickr Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) defends prohibiting undocumented immigrants from getting out-of-state tuition waivers. Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida has been defending his decision to prohibit undocumented immigrants from receiving out-of-state tuition waivers in Florida's colleges and universities. This policy change has sparked controversy and criticism, with many arguing that it is discriminatory and could limit educational opportunities for undocumented students. In response to a reporter's question about the policy change, Governor DeSantis cited his administration's efforts to make higher education more affordable for Floridians. He noted that Florida has the most affordable higher education in the country, with in-state tuition averaging around $6,000 to $6,200. He also expressed his opposition to raising tuition, which he believes could undermine the affordability of higher education in the state. However, the gove

'This Is Just Sort Of An Insult': Rand Paul Questions Biden Archivist Nominee Colleen Shogan

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0,  via Flickr At today's Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) questioned Colleen Shogan, nominee to be Archivist of the United States about classifications. During the Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing, Senator Rand Paul questioned Colleen Shogan, nominee to be Archivist of the United States, about her understanding of the Archivist's role in certifying amendments to the Constitution and whether the Archivist has the power to change or alter the election results.  Shogan stated that the Archivist's function is ministerial and that the Archivist publishes an amendment when it becomes part of the Constitution but does not decide whether an amendment has been ratified. She also stated that she would not allow security at the Archives to force people to cover clothing that has a political speech on it. Senator Paul expressed his concern about the over-classification of government documents, citing an

President Trump Erupts On 'Woke Left' And 'Radical Left Communists,' Unveils Proposed ESG Ban

  Photo "Donald Trump" by  Dan Scavino In a video posted social media, former President Trump pledged to ban ESG investing by executive order should he retake the presidency, slamming the "woke left" and calling such investing a "threat" from "radical left Communists." Former President Trump has pledged to ban ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing by executive order if he retakes the presidency, in a video posted on social media. Trump slammed the "woke left" and called ESG investing a "threat" from "radical left Communists." In the video, Trump claimed that he issued a historic rule banning Wall Street and employers from investing retirement accounts in ESG for political reasons. He called such investments "poorly performing woke Financial scams" that would never be funded on their own merits. Trump alleged that the entire ESG scheme is designed to funnel retirement money to the "Mani

Rep. Jim Jordan Issues New Ultimatum To Biden And Washington Democrats in Yuma, Arizona

  Photo credit: Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0,  via Flickr At Thursday's House Judiciary Committee field hearing in Yuma, Arizona, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) spoke to witnesses about the situation at the border, and said that Republicans will have to use government funding to stop the flow of migrants. Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio has been making headlines for his remarks during a House Judiciary Committee field hearing in Yuma, Arizona. The hearing was focused on the situation at the southern border, and Jordan spoke passionately about the need to address the chaos and danger that he sees there. Jordan began his remarks by noting that President Biden had promised on his first day in office to dismantle many of the policies and structures put in place by the previous administration to secure the border. Jordan argued that this had led directly to the situation at the border today, which he described as "open border chaos." He then asked a question that he felt was fundament